Bibliografía
| Autor | José Luis Martí |
| Cargo del Autor | Profesor de Filosofía del Derecho - Universidad Pompeu Fibra |
| Páginas | 321-352 |
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
AAKEN, A. van, LIST, C., y LÜTGE, C. (eds.), 2003: Deliberation and Decision: A
Dialogue Between Economics, Constitutional Theory and Deliberative Demo-
cracy,Aldershot: Ashgate.
ACKERMAN, B., 1980: Social Justice in the Liberal State, New Haven (Conn.): Yale
University Press (La justicia social en el estado liberal, trad. ROSENKRANTZ, C.,
Madrid: CEC, 1993, por la que se cita).
—1989: «Why Dialogue?», Journal of Philosophy, vol. 86, n. 1: 5-22.
— 1991: We the People, Cambridge (Mass.): Belknap Press of Harvard University
Press.
ACKERMAN, B., y FISHKIN, J., 2002: «Deliberation Day», Journal of Political Phi-
losophy, vol. 10, n. 2: 129-152, publicado también en FISHKIN y LASLETT, 2003:
7-30, por la que se cita).
— 2004: Deliberation Day, New Haven: Yale University Press.
ARISTÓTELES, 1986: Política, trad. GARCÍA GUAL, C., y PÉREZ JIMÉNEZ, A., Madrid:
Alianza.
ARROW, K. J., [1951] 1963: Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: Wiley
(Elección Social y Valores Individuales, trad. APARICIO,Eusebio, Barcelona: Pla-
neta-Agostini, 1994, por la que se cita).
AUSTEN-SMITH, D., y BANKS, J. S., 1990: «Credible Debate Equilibria», Social
Choice and Welfare, vol. 7: 75-93.
—1992: «Strategic Models of Talk in Political Decision Making», International
Political Science Review, vol. 13, n. 1: 45-58.
—1996: «Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Teorem»,
American Political Science Review, vol. 90, n. 1: 34-45.
AXELROD, R., 1984: The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books (La evo-
lución de la cooperación, trad. BOU, L., Madrid: Alianza, 1986).
AYER, A. J. [1936] 1984: Language, Truth and Logic, Harmondsworth: Penguin
Books (Lenguaje, verdad y lógica, trad. SUÁREZ, M., Barcelona: Orbis, 1984).
BACHRACH, P., 1967: The Theory of Democratic Elitism. A Critique, Boston (Mass.):
Little, Brown and Co. (Crítica de la teoría elitista de la democracia, trad. WOLF-
SON, L., Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1973).
322 BIBLIOGRAFÍA
—1973: «Interest, Participation and Democratic Theory», en Participation in Poli-
tics, Nomos, vol. XVI.
BACHRACH, P., y BOTWINICK, A., 1992: Power and Empowerment. A Radical Theory
of Participatory Democracy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
BAILYN, B., 1967: The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution,Cambridge,
Mass., Harvard University Press.
BAIOCCHI, G., 2001: «Participation, Activism, and Politics. The Porto Alegre Expe-
riment and Deliberative Democracy Theory», Politics and Society, vol. 29, n. 1:
43-72.
—2005: Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participation in Porto Allegre,
Stanford: Stanford University Press.
BARBER, B., 1984: Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berke-
ley (Calif.): University of California Press.
— 1998: A Place for Us. How to Make Civil Society and Democracy Strong, New
York, Hill and Wang (Un lugar para todos. Cómo fortalecer la democracia y la
sociedad civil, trad. OSSÉS, C., Barcelona: Paidós, 2000, por la que se cita).
BARRY, B., 1964: «The Public Interest», Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,
vol. 38, n. 1: 112-126.
— 1965: Political Argument, London: Routledge.
BAURMAN, M., 1998: El mercado de la virtud. Moral y responsabilidad social en la
sociedad liberal, trad. GARZÓN VALDÉS, E., Barcelona: Gedisa.
BAYÓ N, J. C., 1991: La normatividad del derecho: deber jurídico y razones para la
acción, Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
—1998: «Diritti, democrazia, costituzione», Ragion Pratica, 10, pp. 41-64.
—2002: «Derecho, convencionalismo y controversia», en NAVARRO, P., y REDON-
DO, C. (eds.), La relevancia del derecho. Ensayos de filosofía jurídica, moral y
política, Barcelona: Gedisa: 57-92.
—2004: «Democracia y derechos: problemas de fundamentación del constitucio-
nalismo», en BETEGÓN, J., et al. (eds.), Constitución y derechos fundamentales,
Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales: 67-138.
BAZERMAN, M., y NEALE, M., 1992: Negotiating Rationally, New York: Free Press.
BECKER, G., 1976: The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago: The Uni-
versity of Chicago Press.
BEITZ, Ch., 1989: Political Equality, Princeton (N. J.): Princeton University Press.
BELL, D. A., 1999: «Democratic Deliberation: The Problem of Implementation», en
MACEDO, 1999: 70-87.
BELLAMY, Ch., 2000: «Modelling Electronic Democracy. Towards democratic dis-
courses for an information age», en HOFF, J., HORROCK, I., y TOPS, P. (eds.),
Democratic Governance and New Technology. Technologically mediated inno-
vations in political practice in Western Europe, London: Routledge: 33-53.
BELLAMY, Ch., y TAYLOR, J.A., 1998: Governing in the Information Age, Bucking-
ham: Open University Press.
BENELLO, C. G., y ROUSSOPOULOS, D. (eds.), 1971: The Case for Participatory
Democracy: Some prospects for a Radical Society, New York: Grossman.
BENHABIB, S., 1986: Critique, Norm, and Utopia, New York: Columbia University Press.
—1989: «Liberal Dialogue Versus a Critical Theory of Discursive Legitimation»,
en N. ROSENBLUM (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life, Cambridge (Mass.):
Harvard University Press: 143-156.
BIBLIOGRAFÍA 323
—1990: «Communicative Ethics and Contemporary Controversies in Practical
Philosophy», en BENHABIB, S., y DALLMAYR, F. (eds.), The Communicative
Ethics Controversy,Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press: 330-369.
—1992a: Situating the Self, Cambridge: Polity Press.
—1992b: «Models of Public Sphere: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and
Jürgen Habermas», en CALHOUN, 1992a: 73-98.
—1993: «La paria y su sombra: sobre la invisibilidad de las mujeres en la filosofía
política de Hannah Arendt», Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política, n. 2:
21-36.
—1994: «Deliberative Rationality and Models of Constitutional Legitimacy»,
Constellations, vol. 1, n. 1: 26-52.
—1996: «Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy», en BENHABIB,
S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference, Princeton (N. J.): Princeton University
Press: 67-94.
BENN, S. I., 1954: «Interests in Politics», Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,
vol. 60: 123-140.
BENTLEY, A. [1908] 1995: The Process of Government, New Brunswick (N. J.):
Transaction.
BERELSON, B., y JANOWITZ, M. (eds.), 1966: Public Opinion and Communication,
New York: The Free Press.
BERG, S., 1993: «Condorcet’s Jury Theorem. Dependency Among Jurors», Social
Choice and Welfare, vol. 10, n. 1: 87-96.
BERLIN, I., 1968: «Two Concepts of Liberty», en Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford:
Oxford University Press: 118-172.
BESSETTE, J. R., 1980: «Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Repu-
blican Government», en GOLDWIN, R., y SCHAMBRA, W. A. (eds.), How Demo-
cratic is the Constitution?, Washington: American Enterprise Institute: 102-116.
— 1994: The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American Natio-
nal Government, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
BESSON, S., 2001: «Constitutional Rights, Precommitment and Disagreement: What
if Ulysses had more than one superego?» (mimeo).
—2003: «Disagreement and Democracy: From Vote to Deliberation and Back
Again? The Move Toward Deliberative “Voting Ethics”», en FERRER, J., e IGLE-
SIAS, M. (eds.), Globalisation, Democracy, and Citizenship-Prospects for the
European Union, Berlin, Duncker und Humblot: 101-135.
—2004: «The Paradox of Democratic Representation. On Whether and How Disa-
greement Should Be Represented», en WINTGENS, L. (ed.), Essays on Legispru-
dence, London: Ashgate.
— 2005: The Morality of Conflict. Study on Reasonable Disagreement in the Law,
London: Hart publishing.
—2006: «Deliberative Demoi-Cracy in the European Union: Towards the Deterri-
torialization of Democracy», en BESSON y MARTÍ, 2006: 180-214.
BESSON, S. y MARTÍ, J. L. (eds), 2006: Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents.
National and Post-national Challenges, London: Ashgate.
BICKEL, A., 1978: The Least Dangerous Branch. The Supreme Court at the Bar of
Politics, New Haven (Conn.): Yale University Press.
BICKFORD, S., 1996: The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict and Citi-
zenship, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba